On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 21:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday 20 March 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > cpuhw = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu); > > > + if (!cpuhw) > > > + return; > > > > How can an address-of expression be NULL? > > > > Yes, 'per_cpu()' is magic, but it shouldn't be possible to be _that_ > > magic. It's rather against the whole C model. > > Yeah. > > A field in the object pointed to by it can be NULL, though. That's what I was aiming for,. might have missed it by a mile though :/ > The appended patch fixes the breakage for me too. ok, works for me, thanks _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
