On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 03:13:30PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Yes, I agree, we need a genric mechanism for PNP to emable wakups. It > > was discussed a bit here: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286 > > > > but David was too hung up on the fact that number of devices in ACPI > > does not map directly onto number of serio ports when i8042 is in active > > multiplexing mode that it id not go anywhere. > > Does this look reasonable? I don't know anything about PNPBIOS or > ISAPNP, so it handles only PNPACPI. But at least it's a starting > point -- and it does enable my system to wake up in response to > hitting a key. > > (This combines changes to the PNP core with changes to the i8042 > drivers. For submission they can be broken out into separate patches.) > > Alan Stern > > > Index: usb-2.6/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h > =================================================================== > --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h > +++ usb-2.6/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h > @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ static int i8042_pnp_kbd_probe(struct pn > } > > i8042_pnp_kbd_devices++; > + device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->dev, true); > return 0; > } > > @@ -646,6 +647,7 @@ static int i8042_pnp_aux_probe(struct pn > } > > i8042_pnp_aux_devices++; > + device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->dev, true); > return 0; > } > > @@ -656,7 +658,7 @@ static struct pnp_device_id pnp_kbd_devi > }; > > static struct pnp_driver i8042_pnp_kbd_driver = { > - .name = "i8042 kbd", > + .name = "i8042-kbd", Why is this needed? I don't think spaces are more dangerous than a colon which we do use... Other than that - looks reasonable to me... -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
