On 24 Feb 2010, at 18:56, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:54:07AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Alan Stern wrote: >> >>>> I'll give it a try and we'll see how it turns out... >> >>> And here it is. You can see that the patch isn't ideal. >> >>> Anyway, it should do what you want -- I haven't tested it. >> >> It's taken a little while to test (and to be frank my testing is >> paper >> thin) but it looks like this does what I'm looking for - thanks! > > But should that patch be submitted for inclusion in the kernel, > warts and all? My feeling is that it solves a real problem so yes and if it turns out there are issues we can always bug fix it later - if it's not merged then cross tree issues would mean that there'd be a substantial lag before it could be used in drivers. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
