> > (Please wrap at column 80) > > > > This patch is already way better than the original one, but... Why do > > you want enable/disable_nonboot_cpus to be noped out? > > Today for PPC_PSERIES, PM_SLEEP_SMP is never defined, so for all the > current code paths that call enable/disable_nonboot_cpus (power off, > kexec), these functions are noops. I don't want to change that > behavior. Why not? > I figured I can just use the prepare_late and wake pm functions to do > the work I need to do. Let me know if you think this is a reasonable > approach and I'll be happy to resend the patch with an appropriate > subject line and description. No, I do not think that's reasonable approach. Please just implement enable/disable_nonboot_cpus; that's the clean fix. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
