On Sun 2010-02-21 10:32:02, Brian King wrote: > > Rather than calling disable_nonboot_cpus and enable_nonboot_cpus > directly, wrapper the calls in a weak arch_suspend_disable_nonboot_cpus > and arch_suspend_enable_nonboot_cpus that can be overridden by > architectures that require different handling of suspending processors > at suspend time than these functions provide. This is needed to enable > suspend/resume on IBM Power servers. This needs *way* better explanation. Like: why do power servers require special handling? What else is disable_nonboot_cpus used for? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
