Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm sorry for the delayed comments. >> >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * pcie_pme_interrupt_enable - Enable/disable PCIe PME interrupt generation. >>> + * @dev: PCIe root port or event collector. >>> + * @enable: Enable or disable the interrupt. >>> + */ >>> +static void pcie_pme_interrupt_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable) >>> +{ >>> + int rtctl_pos; >>> + u16 rtctl; >>> + >>> + rtctl_pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP) + PCI_EXP_RTCTL; >> How about >> >> rtctl_pos = pci_pcie_cap(dev) + PCI_EXP_RTCTL; >> >> ? >> >> The pci_pcie_cap() returns PCIe capability offset saved in struct pci_dev. >> By using this, we can avoid redundant search in PCI configuration space. > > While I agree with the comment, I'd prefer to change this with a separate > patch, unless the entire patchset misses the merge window. > Ok. Actually, I didn't realize your set of patches was already in linux-next, sorry. I'll send a patch as a separate one. Thanks, Kenji Kaneshige _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm