Re: iwlagn on Thinkpad X200

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Matthias-Christian Ott <ott@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:00:47AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Looks mostly reasonable to me.  Did you try 'iwconfig wlan0 power on'?
>
> Yes, it didn't make an improvement.
>
>> If you're feeling adventurous, try iwlcore.no_sleep_autoadjust=0 and
>> 'iwconfig wlan0 power on'.  The combination works for me and
>> decreases power consumption a lot at the cost of a little bit of
>> latency.
>
> It worked for me too, even if it just saved about 6 wake-ups per
> second.

Look at power, not wakeups, for wireless stuff -- powering up the
receiver isn't cheap.

>
> But I still wonder where the other parameters most users report about
> have gone.
>

Look in debugfs.  They've been renamed or removed in recent kernels.

--Andy
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux