On 02/09/2010 08:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Pretty simple to reproduce, boot, suspend, press shift >> >> Acer Aspire 1681, Celeron, 2.6.33-rc6. Trace and config attached. > > This looks suspicious: > > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: ACPI cmd 03/42:00:00:00:a0:ef (CFA REQUEST EXTENDED ERROR) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: ACPI cmd 00/0c:00:00:00:a0:ef (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33 > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: firewire_core: rediscovered device fw0 > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd 03/45:00:00:00:a0:ef (CFA REQUEST EXTENDED ERROR) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd 00/0c:00:00:00:a0:ef (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100 These aren't harmful in themselves. It just means that the device failed commands BIOS requested via ACPI. Just in case, does "libata.noacpi=1" make any difference to the oops? Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
