On Saturday 06 February 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sunday 10 January 2010 07:01:03 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
> > principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
> > platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
> > events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this
> > purpose, a PME generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE
> > associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we
> > can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
> > correctly.
>
> I think acpiphp needs a little attention after this patch. Gary
> Hade noticed while testing Jesse's linux-next branch that acpiphp
> complains like this:
>
> acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.5
> acpiphp: Slot [9] registered
> acpiphp: Slot [10] registered
> acpiphp_glue: failed to register interrupt notify handler
> acpiphp: Slot [6] registered
> acpiphp_glue: failed to register interrupt notify handler
>
> I reproduced this on an HP rx3600 (ia64), and found that acpiphp
> doesn't complain on commit 82533a617f453, but it *does* complain
> on commit fb3383bb4ac6e, which seems to be this patch.
>
> I haven't tried to debug it any farther than just noticing that
> acpiphp starts complaining here, so I don't know what the right
> fix is, or even if acpiphp is really broken.
>
> I did use acpiphp to power-cycle a slot ("echo 0 > power"), and
> it seemed to work despite the warnings. But I guess the notification
> is probably not involved in that path; I suppose the notification
> is like a latch or attention button interrupt or something.
Thanks for the report, I'll look at this tomorrow.
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
