Re: [PATCH] i2c: Hook up runtime PM support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 03 February 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> Allow I2C drivers to make use of the runtime PM framework by adding
> bus implementations of the runtime PM operations. These simply
> immediately suspend when the device is idle.

Perhaps it would be a good idea to give the driver a chance to veto
the suspend by calling its _idle callback?  We do that for PCI and turns out to
be quite useful.

> The runtime PM framework provides drivers with off the shelf refcounts for
> enables and sysfs control for managing runtime suspend from userspace so is
> useful even without meaningful input from the bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 10be7b5..985eaac 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
>  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
>  #include "i2c-core.h"
> @@ -184,6 +185,43 @@ static int i2c_device_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
>  #define i2c_device_pm_resume	NULL
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> +static int i2c_device_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct dev_pm_ops *pm;
> +
> +	if (!dev->driver)
> +		return 0;
> +	pm = dev->driver->pm;
> +	if (!pm || !pm->runtime_suspend)
> +		return 0;
> +	return pm->runtime_suspend(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_device_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct dev_pm_ops *pm;
> +
> +	if (!dev->driver)
> +		return 0;
> +	pm = dev->driver->pm;
> +	if (!pm || !pm->runtime_resume)
> +		return 0;
> +	return pm->runtime_resume(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_device_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	/* I2C devices are very independent of each other so we
> +	 * suspend them immediately. */
> +	return pm_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +}
> +#else
> +#define i2c_device_runtime_suspend	NULL
> +#define i2c_device_runtime_resume	NULL
> +#define i2c_device_runtime_idle		NULL
> +#endif
> +
>  static int i2c_device_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t mesg)
>  {
>  	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> @@ -251,6 +289,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group *i2c_dev_attr_groups[] = {
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_device_pm_ops = {
>  	.suspend = i2c_device_pm_suspend,
>  	.resume = i2c_device_pm_resume,
> +	.runtime_suspend = i2c_device_runtime_suspend,
> +	.runtime_resume = i2c_device_runtime_resume,
> +	.runtime_idle = i2c_device_runtime_idle,
>  };
>  
>  struct bus_type i2c_bus_type = {
> 

Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux