On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:21:47 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:50:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -76,6 +76,30 @@ unsigned long totalreserve_pages __read_ > > int percpu_pagelist_fraction; > > gfp_t gfp_allowed_mask __read_mostly = GFP_BOOT_MASK; > > > > +/* > > + * The following functions are used by the suspend/hibernate code to temporarily > > + * change gfp_allowed_mask in order to avoid using I/O during memory allocations > > + * while devices are suspended. To avoid races with the suspend/hibernate code, > > + * they should always be called with pm_mutex held (gfp_allowed_mask also should > > + * only be modified with pm_mutex held, unless the suspend/hibernate code is > > + * guaranteed not to run in parallel with that modification). > > + */ > > + > > +void set_gfp_allowed_mask(gfp_t mask) > > +{ > > + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pm_mutex)); > > + gfp_allowed_mask = mask; > > +} > > + > > +gfp_t clear_gfp_allowed_mask(gfp_t mask) > > +{ > > + gfp_t ret = gfp_allowed_mask; > > + > > + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pm_mutex)); > > + gfp_allowed_mask &= ~mask; > > + return ret; > > +} > > Maybe put an ifdef CONFIG_foo around these so they don't get included > when they're unneeded? > I guess this: mm/built-in.o: In function `clear_gfp_allowed_mask': : undefined reference to `pm_mutex' mm/built-in.o: In function `set_gfp_allowed_mask': : undefined reference to `pm_mutex' kinda answers my question. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm