On Friday 29 January 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > > - * If @check_resume is set and there's a resume request pending when
> > > > - * __pm_runtime_disable() is called and power.disable_depth is zero, the
> > > > - * function will wake up the device before disabling its run-time PM.
> > > > */
> > > > -void __pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev, bool check_resume)
> > > > +void pm_runtime_disable(struct device *dev)
> > > > {
> > >
> > > Why did you decide to remove the check_resume argument? That decision
> > > should be explained in the patch description.
> >
> > Well, I thought the "which is not necessary any more" would be a sufficient
> > explanation ...
>
> But why is it not necessary now,
Well, all of the existing callers use only one value of it, which is 'false'
(perhaps I should write that in the changelog).
> given that apparently it was necessary before? What has changed to make
> it unnecessary?
It was used in the system suspend code path in main.c (in dpm_prepare()) IIRC,
but it was replaced by the current code.
I don't really think it's useful to try to recall why it was used at one point.
It's not used now and I don't have a usage case for it. If no one else knows
it will be necessary, removing it is the right thing to do.
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
