"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >On Saturday 23 January 2010, Alan Stern wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> > Hmm, OK. >> > >> > Of course, if the driver decides to leave disable_depth > 0, the user still >> > won't be able to do anything about that, but if I understand correctly, you >> > want drivers to have the option to use pm_runtime_forbid() initially, right >> > after pm_runtime_enable(), so that the user space can turn the runtime PM >> > on if desired via sysfs. >> > >> > That makes sense. I have a usage case for that myself. :-) >> > >> > Updated patch is appended. >> >> It looks good. >> >> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Thanks! > >Rafael > _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
