On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Why change the name from "level" to "runtime"? > > > > Because it wouldn't be really obvious what "level" applied to. For example, > > some people might expect the values of "level" to correspond to PCI power > > states for PCI devices and so on, so it might turn out to be confusing. > > But is the name "runtime" any clearer? Especially to people who have > never come across the phrase "runtime power management"? > > Does anybody have a suggestion for a better attribute name? Apparently not, but I can try. ;-) * status * power (power/power looks weird, but the values would make sense) * control No more ideas for now. Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
