On Wednesday 13 January 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:56:15AM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > For sanity purposes, the code ensures that the phy is recent enough to > > > implement the required functionality. It also ensures that all ports have > > > the interrupt enabled - a VIA chip I've tested appears to only allow > > > int_enable to be set on one port at a time, which is inadequate for the > > > purposes of this code. > > > > This adds more extensive use of the link--PHY interface than we ever > > had, and FireWire stacks in other popular OSs may not have used these > > features yet too. We will most certainly discover further errata > > besides the one that you already found. > > I don't doubt it. There's almost certainly serious dragons here on some > hardware. > > > > This depends on the PCI runtime PM code, which is not yet upstream. I'm > > > sending this out now for sanity checking. > > > > Is there a convenient source where I can get the infrastructure, so that > > I could start testing with the few cards that I have? > > Rafael posted the latest set to linux-acpi on the 27th of December. I > don't think there's a set online yet. In fact, I posted an update last Sunday (Jan 10), that should be included into the PCI linux-next branch shortly. The latest patches are here: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72020/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72026/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72019/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72015/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72030/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72021/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72029/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72028/ http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/72027/ Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
