On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:42:28PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday 01 January 2010, Andreas Mohr wrote: > > Then why is the value lower-bounded by pci_pm_d3_delay > > (which, puzzlingly, was initialized to PCI_PM_D3_WAIT and thus 10 > > before, which the patch now removes!), > > That's because dev->d3_delay is initialized to PCI_PM_D3_WAIT for all devices. Doh, I should have viewn the altered mechanism correctly, sorry. Seems quite correct and useful after all. Andreas Mohr _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
