On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:35:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Having read the PM part of the PCIe 2.0 specification more carefully > I think that it was a mistake to restrict the wake-up enable > propagation to non-PCIe devices, because if we do not request > control of the root ports' PME registers via OSC, PCIe PME is > supposed to be handled by the platform, just like the non-PCIe PME. > Even if we do that, the wake-up propagation is done to allow the > devices to wake up the system from sleep states which involves the > platform anyway, so it won't hurt. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++-------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Applied after fixing up conflicts related to dev->is_pcie. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
