On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 13 December 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 13 December 2009, Mahalingam, Nithish wrote: > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > > > I was wondering why PM Runtime Core cannot call the device PM callbacks when > > > > its device's bus does not support runtime PM (if such a scenario is valid)? > > > > > > The assumption was it wouldn't be necessary, but the approach can be extended > > > to device types and device classes. > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Nithish Mahalingam > > > > P.S. Alan, Not sure if you are askin the a similar question in the > > > > "System sleep vs. runtime PM" mail thread. > > > > > > I guess so. > > > > Yes. I mistakenly used the wrong words, but I meant the device type > > and device class. > > So, I guess we need something like device_suspend() and device_resume() > for run-time PM, but we also will need to update the documentation. Yes. > I'll try to prepare a patch for that, unless you already have one ready or > in the works. I don't. Go on ahead. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
