On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Also, when the system resume is finished, drivers need a chance to > > runtime-suspend again. Hence the pm_runtime_put_noidle() call in > > dpm_complete() should be changed to pm_runtime_put_sync(). > > OK > > Are you going to send a patch or do you want me to prepare one? We're talking about mostly documentation changes, right? I can write them. But the code changes will present a small problem. I'll need them for the USB development. Will it be okay to ask Greg KH to put them in his tree after you have accepted them into yours? That will avoid cross-subsystem build errors. (We just got through one of them involving David Miller and I'd rather avoid any more.) There's one other thing (should have brought it up earlier): Do you mind having the runtime-PM callbacks invoke the bus type or the bus class methods instead of the bus methods, if they are defined? That is, do them in the same way the system-PM callbacks work. The USB code will definitely want different methods for the different types. In fact, I've already written a version that tests the bus type within the callback routines. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
