On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Below is a patch I've just tested, but there's a lockdep problem in it I don't > know how to solve. Namely, lockdep is apparently unhappy with us not releasing > the lock taken in device_suspend() and it complains we take it twice in a row > (which we do, but for another device). I need to use down_read_non_owner() > to make it shut up and then I also need to use up_read_non_owner() in > __device_suspend(), Ok, that I admit is actually a problem. Ok, ok, I'll accept that completion() version, even though I think it's inferior. Linus _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
