Re: [PATCH ver. 2] PM: allow for usage_count > 0 in pm_runtime_get()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > and obtain the same effect.  So I don't know...  Should
> > pm_runtime_get() call pm_request_resume() always, or only when the
> > state is SUSPENDING or SUSPENDED?  Should we offer two routines and let
> > people choose which they want?
> 
> I'd prefer to keep the current semantics, ie. drop the patch, at least for now.

Okay.  I'll rewrite my own code to avoid calling it.

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux