On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > However, I don't see any reason to know what woke us up. All we really > > need to know is what devices have wakeup requests outstanding when the > > system resume is finished. It doesn't matter which request came first > > (presumably that was the one which woke us up). > > That assumes that the firmware doesn't do anything stupid with > pending remote wakeups as it resumes the system. I'd call this > unwarranted optimism. The conservative solution would be to resume > every device whose driver has requested remote wakeup be enabled. Drivers certainly can use that as one of their criteria for whether to power-up a device during system resume. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
