On Wednesday 02 December 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> > >>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > >>> > >>>> On Tuesday 01 December 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > >>>>> > >>>>>> In addition to that, you can run multiple hibernation/resume cycles in > >>>>>> a tight loop using the RTC wakealarm. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'll do so, as soon as I find a way to automatically supply the dm-crypt > >>>>> passphrase... or even better, learn to hibernate to ramdisk from the > >>>>> initramfs. :) > >>>> > >>>> Well, you don't need to use swap encryption for _testing_. :-) > >>> > >>> I use partition encryption, everything except for /boot is encrypted. > >> > >> If /boot is big enough, you could use a swap file in /boot for the testing. > > > > Ramdisk worked good. Maybe too good, because I left the machine doing > > s2disks while I was having dinner, and it achieved some 120 suspends > > without a freeze. Only the e100 and the mii modules were loaded. > > > > After some script munging I got the machine automatically boot with an > > alternate passphrase, so in vivo testing is possible now. I mean, > > tomorrow. > > After almost 100 hibernate/resume cycles, I have to say that this issue > can't be reproduced by suspending in a tight loop. I tried that while > flood pinging my gateway and also with no network activity. The rc8 > e100 module was loaded all the time. I wonder if this patch: http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/64276/ helps in your case. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
