On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:04:57AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I thought we'd better ask our friends over at linux-pm, if they've got > > > some interface for this task. To summarize: an embedded application > > > wants to go into a "locked" state, where some input devices (gpio keys > > > in this case) are "muted", ie. they don't even generate interrupts to > > > minimize power consumption. This could be solved by adding a new > > > interface to gpio-keys, but the problem seems more general, so I wonder > > > if something like the USB selective runtime suspend is already available > > > (or preferable to develop) for such tasks. > > > > > > (I hope I got the summary right; Mika will provide the missing bits if I > > > didn't.) > > > > See Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt. I don't know to what extent > > the input layer has implemented any runtime PM. > > Input layer is not implementing any PM since it consists of virtual, not > physical devices, and leaves PM for the appropriate bus drivers (USB, > serio, platform, etc.). > > Also, it is not really runtime PM but rather user-initiated action of > putting device into lower poer state we are talking about here. This is in fact the definition of runtime PM -- except for the "user-initiated" restriction (runtime PM can be initiated by anything or anybody). So it really _is_ runtime PM. But if you prefer to implement it without using the runtime PM framework, that's fine. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
