Am Montag, 23. November 2009 21:59:12 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday 22 November 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Rafael: > > > > > > Here's the situation. Device A has children B1, ..., Bn (possibly > > > others too). I need to guarantee that whenever A is active, so are the > > > children. > > > > > > But it's perfectly valid to have an inactive device under an active > > parent, so I guess this is not a general case. > > Correct. It's a specific case that I need to handle for USB. Hm. In which way is this different from a system where devices share clock lines? It seems to me that groups of devices that can be suspended only together are not rare. That in USB these devices happen to be all a device's interfaces does not really matter. Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm