On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:06:55PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Just prior to 2.6.32 cycle I tried -next tree and noticed that after a > failed s2ram (here it works only once, and I test once in a whileto see > if fixed accidentally) I got a minor filesystem corruption. I am sorry I > didn't report that back then. When you say filesystem corruption, it's important to indicate whether you meant that (a) you noticed that some files were had corrupted contents, (b) the kernel complained that the filesystem was corrupted, and remounted the filesystem read-only, or (c) e2fsck found and fixed errors. Also, when you found errors of either class (a) or (b), did you run e2fsck to find and fix any potential errors? In a few places it sounded like the kernel had complained about errors, but you had ignored them and hadn't run e2fsck to fix them. I hope that was just me misunderstanding what you wrote! Can you clarify? - Ted _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
