Hi again. On 08/24/2009 01:20 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 24 August 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> We should start by asking where you're at as far as knowledge of swsusp >> and TuxOnIce goes. Well, I know swsups a bit and don't know about toi much. Still I think it's not a problem at all. I learn quickly ;). >> I know you've been around the TuxOnIce lists a bit, >> but don't know how much you know about C programming or the inards of >> the kernel, swsusp or TuxOnIce (ie how much help do you need to get up >> to speed?). I think C is no problem at all, so the kernel. The two I mentioned above. I think I'll need no or low help from your side regarding the code site. From what I've read already I would say it's well documented. > Well, if you start from something that people don't like, it may be difficult > to push the rest. > > Still, I think Jiri is more than capable of handling that, so more or less > everything that is a clear improvement and doesn't introduce regressions of any > kind will probably work for me. Thank you guys. I needed to cope with other things (a suspend regression, writable /proc/<pid>/limits etc.) which took me a long time, sorry. Then I also went through the last "discussion" around the last merge try mainly to see what others think about kernel-side implementation of compression etc. I hope I'll come up with something early. Thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
