On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 01:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Recently we've had a bug report indicating that WoL doesn't work with e100, > > although the driver does everything needed to support it. Apparently, the user > > had to echo PCI0 to /proc/acpi/wakeup to make it work. > > > > After some debugging it turned out that PCI0 is the PCI host bridge > > (no-bus:pci0000:00), so apparently echoing PCI0 to /proc/acpi/wakeup causes > > a wake-up GPE to be set up for the host bridge which triggers wake-up once > > eth0 signals PME#. > > > > So, it looks like we need to set up wake-up GPE for a host bridge for PME# > > from add-on cards to work, at least on this particular box. > > > > First, I wonder if that's the case in general (anybody knows?). Second, if > > that is the case, would it be a good idea to set up the host bridge wake-up GPE > > by default? > > > > Rafael > > > > This is very known problem (at least for me) > > On my desktop, /proc/acpi/wakeup controls all the wakeup sources, and if > disabled, nether addon cards (ethernet) nor internal devices > (usb,ethernet) will wake up the system. Can you please open a Bugzilla entry for that and add my address to the CC list in there? > I think that proc/acpi/wakeup should be synced with power/wakeup > attribute. In fact proc/acpi/wakeup is going to be removed at one point in future, so we're moving the functionality to power/wakeup. > Also, I would be really happy to see bogus (empty) power/wakeup > attributes be gone. They are not bogus. Empty power/wakeup means that the device is not capable of waking up the system. > Also, something is broken in regards to PME from addon cards: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg104460.html I'll have a look. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
