Re: [PATCH 1/5] introduce .wakeup_event ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 07:52:10PM +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:24:11PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> 
> > Usually driver should does nothing in the op as bus can handle it. But in some
> > cases, like pci bus, UHCI controller doesn't use standard PME registers for
> > wakeup, instead of using special approach. In this case, UHCI controller driver
> > should implement this op.
> 
> I'm not averse to the general concept, but I'm not entirely sold on it 
> being necessary. All the hardware I'm aware of will send non-PME events 
> as a notification on a specific device. Under what circumstances will we 
> get a wakeup GPE for a non-PME device without knowing which device 
> should be woken?
Below code is gotten from a laptop (samsung-x10), the PCIB is the PCI bridge.
We can't guarantee the device which gets a wakeup event notification is really
the device which invokes the wakeup event.

	Device (PCIB)
        {
                Name (_ADR, 0x001E0000)
                Device (CDB0)
		{
		    Name (_ADR, 0x00030000)
		}
		 Device (CDB1)
                {
                    Name (_ADR, 0x00030001)

		}
	}


        Method (_L0B, 0, NotSerialized)
        {
            Notify (\_SB.PCI0.PCIB, 0x02)
            Notify (\_SB.PWRB, 0x02)
            Store (0x01, \_SB.PCI0.PCIB.CDB0.PMES)
            Store (0x01, \_SB.PCI0.PCIB.CDB1.PMES)
        }

Thanks,
Shaohua
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux