On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:21:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I can even imagine a scenario where this setting might be useful, like when > we don't want a network adapter to be woken up from the outside. I think in that case we'd probably just want the interface to be downed? Some of this is going to require device-specific policy, I think - for the network case we probably want something in between IF_RUNNING and IF_DOWN (IF_CARRIER, perhaps) that indicates that we want the PHY to be powered. Pushing this out to sysfs would mean we'd have a consistent interface but varying semantics, and I'm not convinced that's an especially helpful interface. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
