Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] introduce device async actions mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 13 August 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On a second thought, though, would it be a good idea to add
> > pm_runtime_get_noresume() / pm_runtime_put_sync() around the bus_for_each_drv()
> > in device_attach()?  That would prevent us from resuming-suspending the device
> > on each failing probe.
> 
> Good idea.  But don't remove the existing code in driver_probe_device.

Sure.

OK, I'll make this change and post rev. 16 shortly.

Thanks,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux