Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] introduce device async actions mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > The one thing I'm not sure of is the pm_runtime_put_noidle calls in 
> > driver_probe_device and __device_release_driver.  It seems that we 
> > should always call pm_runtime_put regardless of whether the probe 
> > succeeds or not.
> 
> Did you mean pm_runtime_put_sync()?

Yes.  I haven't used the new code yet so the names don't stick in my 
mind.

> > For example, the USB stack is set up to suspend devices that don't have
> > a driver (this is handled at the bus subsystem level).  But if probing
> > failed, there wouldn't be any idle callback and so the suspend wouldn't
> > take place.
> 
> OK, I'll make this change.

Thanks.  Now I just have to figure out the best way to convert USB over 
to the new framework...

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux