On Thursday 06 August 2009, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > +#define SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(name, suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
> > > > +struct dev_pm_ops name = { \
> > > > + .suspend = suspend_fn, \
> > > > + .resume = resume_fn, \
> > > > + .freeze = suspend_fn, \
> > > > + .thaw = resume_fn, \
> > > > + .poweroff = suspend_fn, \
> > > > + .resume = resume_fn, \
> > >
> > > That defines .resume twice. Guess the last should be restore.
> >
> > Yes, thanks to you and Philipp for noticing that and sorry for the mistake.
>
> When is a good point to resend patches that use this macro? I guess they
> won't make it to .31 anyway, right? So I just wait for the next merge
> window?
Yes, I think that would be the right thing to do.
Best,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
