On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 25 June 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > > If possible, I'd like this to be merged as early as possible since a > > lot of processor specific changes will depend on it. With this > > included in 2.6.31 I can easily build arch specific code for 2.6.32. > > Anything I can do to make that happen? > > > > My top priority is Runtime PM for SuperH on top of your code, and I > > intend to post a prototype for SuperH before the PM Summit. It would > > be great to minimize the dependencies though, and including this in > > 2.6.31 would certainly help. > > I'm going to add this patch to my linux-next branch shortly and if your 2.6.32 > development is based on that branch (I'd recommend that anyway), there > shouldn't be any problems during the 2.6.32 merge window. > Yes, I was already planning on creating a topic branch based off of this so that we can start getting things ready in the sh tree, so this is not a problem.. as long as you don't rebase ;-) _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
