On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday 15 June 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> > I'm not sure whether the example is trustworthy. There was some
> > discussion quite a while ago regarding whether drivers should free
> > their IRQs during suspend, but I don't remember what the outcome was.
>
> No, they shouldn't.
>
> That's why we do the entire suspend_device_irqs() thing etc.
So, ath5k needs something like the following?
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
index 55f7de0..0107cd6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
@@ -665,7 +665,6 @@ ath5k_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
ath5k_led_off(sc);
- free_irq(pdev->irq, sc);
pci_save_state(pdev);
pci_disable_device(pdev);
pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
@@ -686,18 +685,8 @@ ath5k_pci_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (err)
return err;
- err = request_irq(pdev->irq, ath5k_intr, IRQF_SHARED, "ath", sc);
- if (err) {
- ATH5K_ERR(sc, "request_irq failed\n");
- goto err_no_irq;
- }
-
ath5k_led_enable(sc);
return 0;
-
-err_no_irq:
- pci_disable_device(pdev);
- return err;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
