On Fri 2009-06-12 13:32:18, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2009-06-11 22:42:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > git commit 0a0c5168 "PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming > > > device interrupts" introduced some helper functions. However these > > > functions are only available for architectures which support > > > GENERIC_HARDIRQS. > > > > I believe architectures that do not use GENERIC_HARDIRQs should just > > provide the empty functions themselves. > > > > If we want to help them, perhaps few attribute((weak)) functions in > > the core are the way to go... > > We can still do that when there actually is an architecture that doesn't > support GENERIC_HARDIRQs _and_ needs non-empty functions. Ok, I guess that makes sense. Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
