Am Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009 00:01:20 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > We have queued up resume requests for the device's parent, its parent etc., > the topmost one goes first. The workqueue is singlethread, so > pm_autoresume() is going to be run for all parents before the device > itself, so if that were the only resume mechanism, it would be enough to > check if the parent is RPM_ACTIVE. A (IDLE) / \ B (SUSPENDED) C (SUSPENDED) Suppose C is to be resumed. This means first in case of A the request to suspend would be cancelled. Here you drop the locks: + && (dev->parent->power.runtime_status == RPM_IDLE + || dev->parent->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING + || dev->parent->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDED)) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->parent->power.lock, parent_flags); + + /* We have to resume the parent first. */ + pm_request_resume(dev->parent); But after pm_request_resume() returns there's no means to make sure nothing alters it back to RPM_SUSPENDED. The workqueue doesn't help you because you've scheduled nothing by that time. The suspension will work because C is still in RPM_SUSPENDED. Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm