On Tue 2009-06-09 15:34:02, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:44:51 +0200
> Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/s390/power/swsusp.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/s390/power/swsusp.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Support for suspend and resume on s390
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2009
> > > + *
> > > + * Author(s): Hans-Joachim Picht <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gfp.h>
> > > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > > +#include <asm/ipl.h>
> > > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> >
> > Empty functions do not need 1000 includes...
>
> Thanks for spotting this. I will remove these.
>
> > > +/*
> > > + * save CPU registers before creating a hibernation image and
> > > before
> > > + * restoring the memory state from it
> > > + */
> > > +void save_processor_state(void)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * restore the contents of CPU registers
> > > + */
> > > +void restore_processor_state(void)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> >
> > ...and explaining why the functions can be emmpty would be nice.
>
> I integrated the code for this in the assembly backend in the
> swsusp_arch_suspend & swsusp_arch_resume functions.
I guessed so. Maybe it is worth a comment?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
