Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Matt Helsley (matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx):
>> -int cgroup_frozen(struct task_struct *task)
>> +int cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(struct task_struct *task)
>> {
>> struct freezer *freezer;
>> enum freezer_state state;
>>
>> task_lock(task);
>> freezer = task_freezer(task);
>> - state = freezer->state;
>> + if (!freezer->css.cgroup->parent)
>> + state = CGROUP_THAWED; /* root cgroup can't be frozen */
>> + else
>> + state = freezer->state;
>
> Why do you have to add this special-casing now? I thought
> we were already preventing freezing the root cgroup, so
> freezer->state should be sane in that case anyway?
>
Yeah, IIRC top_freezer->state is alwasy CGROUP_THAWED, so this
check is redundant.
>> task_unlock(task);
>>
>> - return state == CGROUP_FROZEN;
>> + return (state == CGROUP_FREEZING) || (state == CGROUP_FROZEN);
>> }
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
