On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Returning 0 from usb_external_resume_device() if the device is not present > any more doesn't seem wrong. It's not really an error condition, IMO, because > it's rather normal that the devices may be removed while suspended. > > OTOH, I don't think we can ignore -ENODEV universally in the core, because > its meaning may depend on the bus type. For example, for PCI it sometimes > means a hardware problem has occured (other than the device being not present > any more). > I'd vote in favor of the Frans' patch, at least for now. > > So, Frans, please resubmit with the changelog modified as requested by Alan. If we change -ENODEV to 0, the change should be made in usb_resume() rather than usb_external_resume_device(). Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
