On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:07:35PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > 2009/5/29 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: > > On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> --- 0001/arch/Kconfig > >> +++ work/arch/Kconfig 2009-05-15 14:51:35.000000000 +0900 > >> @@ -112,3 +112,6 @@ config HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > >> > >> ?config HAVE_DEFAULT_NO_SPIN_MUTEXES > >> ? ? ? bool > >> + > >> +config HAVE_PLATFORM_DEVICE_ARCHDATA > > > > Hmm. ?Do we really need yet another CONFIG_ option for that? > > I don't think we need a total of 3 different config options for the > platform device pm stuff, but I do think it makes sense to handle the > platform archdata separately. Not sure which is the best way though, > the #ifdefery is not very pretty. Maybe the best solution is just to > drop the Kconfig stuff and add empty structures to all architecture > versions of asm/device.h. > A stub in asm-generic/device.h will cover the majority of cases. That is much cleaner than adding to the Kconfig mess. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
