On Thu, 28 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I think we'll need one separate workqueue for run-time PM in general, so that > bus types don't introduce their own workqueues for this purpose. IMO one > system-wide run-time PM workqueue should be sufficient (it could also be > used for the suspend blockers BTW). > > So, perhaps it makes sense to implement such a workqueue at the core level? > Thoughts? That's fine with me. This new workqueue can take over the job of the "ksuspend_usbd" workqueue. But it would have to be marked as freezable. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
