Am Montag, 25. Mai 2009 14:32:28 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > I'm going to try to. Unfortunately, they'll require what's basically a > > group-up redesign of the basic algorithm, because to get maximum > > reliability, you need to carefully account for the amount of storage > > you're going to need and the amount of memory you have available, and > > 'prepare' the image prior to doing the atomic copy. > > I don't quite get it; why is that needed? > > If there's not enough swap available, swsusp should freeze, realize > there's no swap, unfreeze and continue. I do not see reliability > problem there. The software suspend may be a part of your response to an imminent power failure (UPS near empty). The number of retries available is possibly limited. I'd feel safer if hibernation by default wrote to a dedicated partition, especially as modern practice is to make swap space smaller than RAM. Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
