On Monday 18 May 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:14:29AM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 May 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:55:05PM +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 17 May 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > +static unsigned long minimum_image_size(unsigned long saveable)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + unsigned long size;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* Compute the number of saveable pages we can free. */
> > > > > > + size = global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE)
> > > > > > + + global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON)
> > > > > > + + global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON)
> > > > > > + + global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE)
> > > > > > + + global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> > > > >
> > > > > For example, we could drop the 1.25 ratio and calculate the above
> > > > > reclaimable size with more meaningful constraints:
> > > > >
> > > > > /* slabs are not easy to reclaim */
> > > > > size = global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) / 2;
> > > >
> > > > Why 1/2?
> > >
> > > Also a very coarse value:
> > > - we don't want to stress icache/dcache too much
> > > (unless they grow too large)
> > > - my experience was that the icache/dcache are scanned in a slower
> > > pace than lru pages.
> > > - most importantly, inside the NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE pages, maybe half
> > > of the pages are actually *in use* and cannot be freed:
> > > % cat /proc/sys/fs/inode-nr
> > > 30450 16605
> > > % cat /proc/sys/fs/dentry-state
> > > 41598 35731 45 0 0 0
> > > See? More than half entries are in-use. Sure many of them will actually
> > > become unused when dentries are freed, but in the mean time the internal
> > > fragmentations in the slabs can go up.
> > >
> > > > > /* keep NR_ACTIVE_ANON */
> > > > > size += global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> > > >
> > > > Why exactly did you omit ACTIVE_ANON?
> > >
> > > To keep the "core working set" :)
> > >
> > > > > /* keep mapped files */
> > > > > size += global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
> > > > > size += global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> > > > > size -= global_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED);
> > > > >
> > > > > That restores the hard core working set logic in the reverse way ;)
> > > >
> > > > I think the 1/2 factor for NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE may be too high in some cases,
> > > > but I'm going to check that.
> > >
> > > Yes, after updatedb. In that case simple magics numbers may not help.
> > > In that case we should really first call shrink_slab() in a loop to
> > > cut down the slab pages to a sane number.
> >
> > I have verified that the appended patch works reasonably well.
>
> This is illogical: in previous email you complained the formula
>
> TOTAL - MAPPED - ACTIVE_ANON - SLAB/2
>
> gives too high number, while
>
> TOTAL - MAPPED
>
> in this patch is OK. (I'm not claiming the first formula to be fine.)
I wasn't precise enough. :-)
The problem with the first formula is that it's not really useful when used
_before_ running shrink_all_memory(), becuase it may give arbitraty result
in that case (everything depends on the preceding memory usage pattern).
However, if it is used _after_ running shrink_all_memory(<all saveable pages>),
the resulting minimum image size is usually (most often) below the real minimum
number of saveable pages that can stay in memory.
The second formula, OTOH, doesn't depend so much on the preceding memory usage
pattern and therefore it seems to be suitable for computing the estimate of the
minimum image size _before_ running shrink_all_memory(). Still, when used
_after_ running shrink_all_memory(<all saveable pages>), it will give a number
below the actual minimum number of saveable pages (ie. not a really suitable
one).
Now, since we're going to get rid of shrink_all_memory() at one point, I think
we should be looking for a formula suitable for using before it's called.
This, IMO, the second one is just about right. :-)
> > The value returned as the minimum image size is usually too high, but not very
> > much (on x86_64 usually about 20%) and there are no "magic" coefficients
>
> It is _OK_ for the minimum image size to be higher, that margin serves
> as a safety margin as well as the working set size we want to preserve.
I didn't say it wasn't OK. :-) It's totally fine by me.
> > involved any more and the computation of the minimum image size is carried out
> > before calling shrink_all_memory() (so it's still going to be useful after
> > we've dropped shrink_all_memory() at one point).
>
> That's OK. Because shrink_all_memory() shrinks memory in a prioritized
> list-after-list order.
>
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: PM/Hibernate: Do not try to allocate too much memory too hard (rev. 2)
> >
> > We want to avoid attempting to free too much memory too hard during
> > hibernation, so estimate the minimum size of the image to use as the
> > lower limit for preallocating memory.
>
> I'd like to advocate to add "working set preservation" as another goal
> of this function, and I can even do with the formula in this patch :-)
>
> That means, when one day more accurate working set estimation is
> possible, we can extend this function to support that goal.
OK, so do you think it's fine to go with the patch below for now?
Thanks,
Rafael
> > The approach here is based on the (experimental) observation that we
> > can't free more page frames than the sum of:
> >
> > * global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE)
> > * global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON)
> > * global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON)
> > * global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE)
> > * global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
> >
> > minus
> >
> > * global_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED)
> >
> > Namely, if this number is subtracted from the number of saveable
> > pages in the system, we get a good estimate of the minimum reasonable
> > size of a hibernation image.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/power/snapshot.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> > @@ -1204,6 +1204,36 @@ static void free_unnecessary_pages(void)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * minimum_image_size - Estimate the minimum acceptable size of an image
> > + * @saveable: Number of saveable pages in the system.
> > + *
> > + * We want to avoid attempting to free too much memory too hard, so estimate the
> > + * minimum acceptable size of a hibernation image to use as the lower limit for
> > + * preallocating memory.
> > + *
> > + * We assume that the minimum image size should be proportional to
> > + *
> > + * [number of saveable pages] - [number of pages that can be freed in theory]
> > + *
> > + * where the second term is the sum of (1) reclaimable slab pages, (2) active
> > + * and (3) inactive anonymouns pages, (4) active and (5) inactive file pages,
> > + * minus mapped file pages.
> > + */
> > +static unsigned long minimum_image_size(unsigned long saveable)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long size;
> > +
> > + size = global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE)
> > + + global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON)
> > + + global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON)
> > + + global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE)
> > + + global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE)
> > + - global_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED);
> > +
> > + return saveable <= size ? 0 : saveable - size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > * hibernate_preallocate_memory - Preallocate memory for hibernation image
> > *
> > * To create a hibernation image it is necessary to make a copy of every page
> > @@ -1220,8 +1250,8 @@ static void free_unnecessary_pages(void)
> > *
> > * If image_size is set below the number following from the above formula,
> > * the preallocation of memory is continued until the total number of saveable
> > - * pages in the system is below the requested image size or it is impossible to
> > - * allocate more memory, whichever happens first.
> > + * pages in the system is below the requested image size or the minimum
> > + * acceptable image size returned by minimum_image_size(), whichever is greater.
> > */
> > int hibernate_preallocate_memory(void)
> > {
> > @@ -1282,6 +1312,11 @@ int hibernate_preallocate_memory(void)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Estimate the minimum size of the image. */
> > + pages = minimum_image_size(saveable);
> > + if (size < pages)
> > + size = min_t(unsigned long, pages, max_size);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Let the memory management subsystem know that we're going to need a
> > * large number of page frames to allocate and make it free some memory.
> > @@ -1294,8 +1329,8 @@ int hibernate_preallocate_memory(void)
> > * The number of saveable pages in memory was too high, so apply some
> > * pressure to decrease it. First, make room for the largest possible
> > * image and fail if that doesn't work. Next, try to decrease the size
> > - * of the image as much as indicated by image_size using allocations
> > - * from highmem and non-highmem zones separately.
> > + * of the image as much as indicated by 'size' using allocations from
> > + * highmem and non-highmem zones separately.
> > */
> > pages_highmem = preallocate_image_highmem(highmem / 2);
> > max_size += pages_highmem;
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
