Re: [PATCH 5/6] PM/Hibernate: Do not release preallocated memory unnecessarily (rev. 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2009-05-14 19:52:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 14 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > > Since the hibernation code is now going to use allocations of memory
> > > to make enough room for the image, it can also use the page frames
> > > allocated at this stage as image page frames.  The low-level
> > > hibernation code needs to be rearranged for this purpose, but it
> > > allows us to avoid freeing a great number of pages and allocating
> > > these same pages once again later, so it generally is worth doing.
> > > 
> > > [rev. 2: Take highmem into account correctly.]
> > 
> > I don't get it. What is advantage of this patch? It makes the code
> > more complex... Is it supposed to be faster?
> 
> Yes, in some test cases it is reported to be faster (along with [4/6],
> actually).
> 
> Besides, we'd like to get rid of shrink_all_memory() eventually and it is a
> step in this direction.

Ok, but maybe we should wait with applying this until we have patches
that actually get us rid of shrink_all_memory? Maybe it will not be
feasible for speed reasons after all, or something...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux