On Thu 2009-05-14 19:52:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 14 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > Since the hibernation code is now going to use allocations of memory > > > to make enough room for the image, it can also use the page frames > > > allocated at this stage as image page frames. The low-level > > > hibernation code needs to be rearranged for this purpose, but it > > > allows us to avoid freeing a great number of pages and allocating > > > these same pages once again later, so it generally is worth doing. > > > > > > [rev. 2: Take highmem into account correctly.] > > > > I don't get it. What is advantage of this patch? It makes the code > > more complex... Is it supposed to be faster? > > Yes, in some test cases it is reported to be faster (along with [4/6], > actually). > > Besides, we'd like to get rid of shrink_all_memory() eventually and it is a > step in this direction. Ok, but maybe we should wait with applying this until we have patches that actually get us rid of shrink_all_memory? Maybe it will not be feasible for speed reasons after all, or something... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm