On Tue, 12 May 2009 00:44:36 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Which means this patch: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124165031723627 (it also is my favourite > one). ho hum, I could live with that ;) Would it make sense to turn it into something more general? Instead of "tasks_frozen/processes_are_frozen()", present it as "oom_killer_disabled/oom_killer_is_disabled()"? That would invite other subsystems to use it, if they want to. Which might well be a bad thing on their behalf, hard to say.. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
