Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kenneth Crudup wrote:
> Oh, and I can hit "ESC" in the middle of suspending with TuxOnIce and
> back out of it if I'd changed my mind for whatever reason.
> 
> There are(/were) competing ieee1394 OHCI drivers and competing Bluetooth
> USB HCI drivers, and that's just off the top of my head- so having
> competing suspend/resume methods won't be anything new. Let the market
> decide which is best.

The case of two 1394 driver stacks isn't fully comparable.  I supported 
the addition of the second stack with the intent to replace the existing 
one after a transition period, and in the hope that the ratio of 
available maintainer manpower : size and complexity of the codebase 
would improve considerably.  Because that was/is the single fundamental 
problem in Linux 1394 driver land.

(Besides, how well is infrastructure like the suspend--resume framework 
comparable to drivers?)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux