On Saturday 09 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 00:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday 08 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Friday 08 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 23:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > On Thu 2009-05-07 19:42:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > On Thursday 07 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: [--snip--] > > > And the code includes some fundamental differences. I freeze processes > > > and prepare the whole image before saving anything or doing an atomic > > > copy whereas you just free memory before doing the atomic copy. You save > > > everything in one part whereas I save the image in two parts. > > > > IMO the differences are not that fundamental. The whole problem boils down > > to using the same data structures for memory management and I think we can > > reach an agreement here. > > I think we might be able to agree on using the same data structures, but > I'm not so sure about algorithms - I think you're underestimating the > differences here. Well, which algorithms do you have in mind in particular? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
