Hi. On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:40 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The timeout is actually a workaround for the problem that we don't > really > know if tasks are going to react to our freeze requests and how much time it is > going to take. The current value of 20 s was chosen after a number of > experiments showing that in some cases the freezing _was_ going to take so > much time. Of course the question is whether it makes sense to give up earlier > even if tasks would eventually freeze, but that's a different issue. What were the circumstances in which freezing could take 20s? > Now, I think the Arve's approach is reasonable. If we know in advace that > we're not going to suspend, it's better to stop the freezing as soon as > possible. Agreed. Regards, Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
