Hi Sam. On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:03 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 12:39:05AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > This patch adds support for communicating with a userspace helper via a > > netlink socket. It is used by the userspace user interface support and > > by the storage manager support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > kernel/power/Makefile | 4 + > > kernel/power/tuxonice_netlink.c | 339 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 343 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 kernel/power/tuxonice_netlink.c > > > > diff --git a/kernel/power/Makefile b/kernel/power/Makefile > > index 07efc8a..180b89a 100644 > > --- a/kernel/power/Makefile > > +++ b/kernel/power/Makefile > > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ tuxonice_core-objs := tuxonice_modules.o tuxonice_sysfs.o tuxonice_highlevel.o \ > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TOI) += tuxonice_builtin.o > > > > +ifdef CONFIG_NET > > +tuxonice_core-objs += tuxonice_netlink.o > > +endif > > If you replace tuxonice_core-objs with tuxonice_core-y in your MAkefile the > above can be simplified to: > tuxonice_core-$(CONFIG_NET) += tuxonice_netlink.o > > (On the assumption that CONFIG_NET is a bool) Thanks for the review. I have support for building tuxonice as modules that I'm not asking to be merged (at least not yet - it adds too many symbol exports at the moment). As a result, I did the simplification but left the tuxonice_core_objs definition. Is that what you'd do? Regards, Nigel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
